"Rokokostrategen": Ihr negativer Nachruhm in der Militärgeschichtsschreibung des 20. Jahrhunderts. Das Beispiel von Reinhard Höhn und das Problem des "moralischen" Faktors
Title | "Rokokostrategen": Ihr negativer Nachruhm in der Militärgeschichtsschreibung des 20. Jahrhunderts. Das Beispiel von Reinhard Höhn und das Problem des "moralischen" Faktors |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 1999 |
Authors | Mönch, Winfried |
Journal | Aufklärung |
Volume | 11 |
Issue | 2 |
Pagination | 75-97 |
Abstract | The verdict of military historians concerning the art of war in the eighteenth century is that is was a self-referential game, characterised by „indecisiveness“. The label of „decadence“ has been attached to it since the end of the nineteenth century. This judgement is used as an unconsidered historiographic pattern of interpretation to „explain“ why the traditional mercenary armies had been defeated by the forces of the French Revolution. Using as an example Reinhard Höhn and his work „Revolution, Heer, Kriegsbild“, published in 1944, this essay presents the problem of factors that decide a war as developed by twentieth century military theory. In the discussions concerning the „degenerate art of war“ of the Rococo period, one leitmotif of military history in the twentieth century becomes evident. It sees in the social deficits of the absolutist armies of the eighteenth century the decisive reason for their „moral“ failure on the battlefield (for example at Jena and Auerstedt in 1806). After that, the essay demonstrates how Höhns historical concept of the „moral factor“ lives on in his influential works on business administration as the basis of a theory of how to motivate workers in a firm. |
URL | https://www.jstor.org/stable/24361434?seq=1 |
Translated Title | "Rococo strategists": Their Negative Afterglory in the Military Historiography of the 20th Century. The example of Reinhard Höhn and the Problem of the "Moral" Factor |